<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Laws of Play</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawsofplay.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com</link>
	<description>Your Source for Video Game Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Who will defend gamers? by Games for the Literati and Books for Gamers &#124; Brews and Books</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/who-will-defend-gamers/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Games for the Literati and Books for Gamers &#124; Brews and Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=91#comment-223</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote for Laws of Play, the audience that plays games has also evolved. Sixty-nine percent of American heads of households [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote for Laws of Play, the audience that plays games has also evolved. Sixty-nine percent of American heads of households [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Grey Market Games by Too expensive</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/the-problem-with-grey-market-games/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Too expensive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=504#comment-222</guid>
		<description>70 dollars for a game. How many copies they&#039;ve sold? Call of duty: Modern warfare (call of duty 4) by 2009 had sold 13 million copies. Those grey market copies are low in numbers.
Well, 70 dollars in USA, in Europe 70 euros (96 usd). So, supposing a medium price of 80 dollars, it makes for a total of 13,000,000 x 80 = 1040,000,000 USD. I think that pays and exceeds the develop and marketing costs.

In my opinion, they should sell games cheaper or stop banning those grey market games and stop attacking second hand buys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>70 dollars for a game. How many copies they&#8217;ve sold? Call of duty: Modern warfare (call of duty 4) by 2009 had sold 13 million copies. Those grey market copies are low in numbers.<br />
Well, 70 dollars in USA, in Europe 70 euros (96 usd). So, supposing a medium price of 80 dollars, it makes for a total of 13,000,000 x 80 = 1040,000,000 USD. I think that pays and exceeds the develop and marketing costs.</p>
<p>In my opinion, they should sell games cheaper or stop banning those grey market games and stop attacking second hand buys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What American Needle v. NFL Could Mean for Gamers by Vertie Jury</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/what-american-needle-v-nfl-could-mean-for-gamers/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Vertie Jury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=626#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Fairly nice post, really useful information. Never ever considered I&#039;d find the tips I would like in this article. I have been hunting throughout the net for a while now and was starting to get disappointed. Thankfully, I came onto your internet site and received exactly what I had been looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairly nice post, really useful information. Never ever considered I&#8217;d find the tips I would like in this article. I have been hunting throughout the net for a while now and was starting to get disappointed. Thankfully, I came onto your internet site and received exactly what I had been looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Capcom Sends MKR Lawsuit to the Grave, Hopes it Doesn&#8217;t Rise Again by Tyson M. Gautreaux</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/capcom-sends-mkr-lawsuit-to-the-grave-hopes-it-doesnt-rise-again/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyson M. Gautreaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=229#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Has anyone seen the new way to make money with youtube? They make 200 videos for you, and guarentee you at least 20,000 views for your business. Check it out: &lt;a href=&quot;http://budurl.com/feps&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://budurl.com/feps&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone seen the new way to make money with youtube? They make 200 videos for you, and guarentee you at least 20,000 views for your business. Check it out: <a href="http://budurl.com/feps" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/feps</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Grey Market Games by Video Game&#8217;s Legal Challenges: 2010 and Beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/the-problem-with-grey-market-games/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Game&#8217;s Legal Challenges: 2010 and Beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=504#comment-217</guid>
		<description>[...] The online trade of grey market games is also increasing at a staggering rate.  While many of these transactions are carried out successfully, others have caused serious headaches for gamers and developers.  For a better understanding of the grey market game trade, read this prior Laws of Play post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The online trade of grey market games is also increasing at a staggering rate.  While many of these transactions are carried out successfully, others have caused serious headaches for gamers and developers.  For a better understanding of the grey market game trade, read this prior Laws of Play post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What American Needle v. NFL Could Mean for Gamers by Video Game&#8217;s Legal Challenges: 2010 and Beyond</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/what-american-needle-v-nfl-could-mean-for-gamers/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Video Game&#8217;s Legal Challenges: 2010 and Beyond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=626#comment-216</guid>
		<description>[...] gamers have already witnessed the start of two major events that could reshape the gaming industry: American Needle and the FCC talks on net neutrality.  With the first month of 2010 now behind us, Laws of Play [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gamers have already witnessed the start of two major events that could reshape the gaming industry: American Needle and the FCC talks on net neutrality.  With the first month of 2010 now behind us, Laws of Play [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Transcripts from Bethesda/Interplay Injunction Hearing Released by LawsOfPlay</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/update-more-transcripts-from-interplaybethesda-preliminary-injunction-released/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>LawsOfPlay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=663#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I think that the lack of understanding regarding the type of relief granted by preliminary injunctions (which seems apparent in the previous transcript) may have been a reason that Bethesda ultimately changed representation, but you&#039;re absolutely correct that a preliminary injunction was a worthwhile gamble.

As far as a future time line is concerned, your guess is as good as mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the lack of understanding regarding the type of relief granted by preliminary injunctions (which seems apparent in the previous transcript) may have been a reason that Bethesda ultimately changed representation, but you&#8217;re absolutely correct that a preliminary injunction was a worthwhile gamble.</p>
<p>As far as a future time line is concerned, your guess is as good as mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Transcripts from Bethesda/Interplay Injunction Hearing Released by Jas</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/update-more-transcripts-from-interplaybethesda-preliminary-injunction-released/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 23:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=663#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Interesting post and great site!

It may be that Bethesda&#039;s lawyers didn&#039;t understand the purpose of preliminary injunctions, I suppose.  But isn&#039;t a more likely explanation (assuming US preliminary injunctions are anything like English preliminary injunctions, which they seem to be) that they knew exactly what they are for, but were taking an (ultimately unsuccessful) gamble at obtaining potentially quite damaging preliminary relief, which could conceivably have brought Interplay to the table?

Incidentally, Bethesda is going to appeal - http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewtopic.php?t=23584. Any thoughts on the likely timeframe?

Jas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and great site!</p>
<p>It may be that Bethesda&#8217;s lawyers didn&#8217;t understand the purpose of preliminary injunctions, I suppose.  But isn&#8217;t a more likely explanation (assuming US preliminary injunctions are anything like English preliminary injunctions, which they seem to be) that they knew exactly what they are for, but were taking an (ultimately unsuccessful) gamble at obtaining potentially quite damaging preliminary relief, which could conceivably have brought Interplay to the table?</p>
<p>Incidentally, Bethesda is going to appeal &#8211; <a href="http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewtopic.php?t=23584" rel="nofollow">http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewtopic.php?t=23584</a>. Any thoughts on the likely timeframe?</p>
<p>Jas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on San Diego GOP Chairman: Video Game Pirate? by AimbotDownload.com</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/san-diego-gop-chairman-video-game-pirate/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>AimbotDownload.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=114#comment-212</guid>
		<description>A decent article, i&#039;ve bookmarked it so I can read through it properly later when i&#039;m back from work.Thanks for the article again! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A decent article, i&#8217;ve bookmarked it so I can read through it properly later when i&#8217;m back from work.Thanks for the article again! <img src='http://www.lawsofplay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What American Needle v. NFL Could Mean for Gamers by NFL Antitrust Case Could Have Game Implications [Madden]</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/what-american-needle-v-nfl-could-mean-for-gamers/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>NFL Antitrust Case Could Have Game Implications [Madden]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=626#comment-211</guid>
		<description>[...] What American Needle v. NFL Could Mean for Gamers [Laws of Play] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What American Needle v. NFL Could Mean for Gamers [Laws of Play] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
