<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laws of Play &#187; Injunction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/tag/injunction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com</link>
	<description>Your Source for Video Game Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 04:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Transcripts from Bethesda/Interplay Injunction Hearing Released</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/update-more-transcripts-from-interplaybethesda-preliminary-injunction-released/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/update-more-transcripts-from-interplaybethesda-preliminary-injunction-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Prestia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bethesda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fallout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interplay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC Game]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newly released transcripts give further insight into this high profile trademark dispute.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Interplay insider has once again provided <a href="http://www.duckandcover.cx/" target="_blank">Duck and Cover</a> with <a href="http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewtopic.php?t=23601" target="_blank">a partial transcript of December&#8217;s preliminary injunction hearing</a> in the <em>Bethesda v. Interplay</em> <em>Fallout</em> trademark dispute.  If you need a refresher on the history of the dispute, you can read previous Laws of Play coverage <a href="http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/bethesda-appeals-denial-of-preliminary-injunction/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/update-more-transcripts-from-interplaybethesda-preliminary-injunction-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Injunction Issued Against CTA Ban on M-Rated Game Ads</title>
		<link>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/injunction-issued-against-cta-ban-on-m-rated-game-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/injunction-issued-against-cta-ban-on-m-rated-game-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Prestia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Injunction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawsofplay.com/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to an Entertainment Software Association (&#8220;ESA&#8221;) press release, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted a preliminary injunction against the Chicago Transit Authority (&#8220;CTA&#8221;) practice of banning M-rated video game advertisements.  The case considered the constitutionality of a CTA ordinance that prohibited any advertisement that “markets or identifies a video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to an <a href="http://www.theesa.com/newsroom/release_detail.asp?releaseID=82" target="_blank">Entertainment Software Association (&#8220;ESA&#8221;) press release</a>, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted a preliminary injunction against the Chicago Transit Authority (&#8220;CTA&#8221;) practice of banning M-rated video game advertisements.  The case considered the constitutionality of a CTA ordinance that prohibited any advertisement that “markets or identifies a video or computer game rated ‘Mature 17+’ (M) or ‘Adults Only 18+’ (AO).”  In the opinion, Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer stated, “…the advertisements the CTA wishes to ban promote expression that has constitutional value and implicates core First Amendment concerns.”</p>
<p>ESA President and CEO Mike Gallagher stated that the &#8220;ruling is a win for Chicago&#8217;s citizens, the video game industry and, above all, the First Amendment.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bus advertising is a persistent hot spot for first amendment litigation.  After viewing many of the banned game ads (one is pictured above), I think the court came to the proper conclusion.  The ads themselves are in no way obscene or inappropriate, so I find it difficult to believe that the CTA had any compelling interested in limiting this commercial speech in a public forum.</p>
<p>Read the full press release <a href="http://www.theesa.com/newsroom/release_detail.asp?releaseID=82" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawsofplay.com/articles/injunction-issued-against-cta-ban-on-m-rated-game-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
